Simple.
About
Log inSign up

Corporate Transparency Act and BOI reporting for family offices

Explore the impact of the Corporate Transparency Act on family offices. Learn key definitions, historical context, and compliance requirements as this landmark legislation ushers in a new era of accountability and transparency.

Simple Team·November 20, 2023·Updated July 25, 2026· 4 min read
JurisdictionsOperations
corporate transparency act
  • The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) became effective on January 1, 2024, ushering in a new era of transparency and reporting obligations for family offices.
  • Enacted in response to the corruption exposed in the Panama Papers scandal, the CTA has five main objectives, including establishing federal standards for incorporation practices.
  • Many family offices will be required to disclose crucial information such as legal names, addresses, and personal details to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN). Non-compliance may result in civil penalties.

The Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) of 2021 will become effective from January 1, 2024. Enacted in response to the corruption exposed in the Panama Papers scandal, the CTA will bring about a significant shift in reporting obligations and transparency measures for family offices.

This insight discusses the bill, highlights key definitions and explores its implications for family offices.

What is the Corporate Transparency Act?

In an effort to fight financial crimes, the US Congress passed the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) in 2021. The CTA Act has five main objectives:

  • To establish a clear federal standard for incorporation practices.
  • To safeguard critical national security interests.
  • Protect interstate and foreign commerce and facilitate adequate national security, intelligence, and law enforcement.
  • To combat money laundering, terrorism financing, and other illicit activities.
  • To ensure compliance with international anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism standards.

What is the historical background?

In 2016, the Panama Papers leak exposed the use of “shell companies” by political and business elites to hide the identity of their owners and engage in corrupt practices. Following this, the Obama administration proposed the creation of a national registry to document the actual owners of such companies, as well as other measures to combat offshore fraud and deception.

Currently, more corporations are created in the United States than in any other jurisdiction. In particular, Delaware receives over 600 new business registrations daily. That is because, in some cases, setting up a US company requires less identifying information than obtaining a library card. Congress wanted to address this issue by creating a national registry identifying the persons who own these companies or are in charge of their day-to-day operations.

In a press release, Secretary of the Treasury Janet L. Yellen expressed that the passing of the CTA “will make it harder for criminals, organised crime rings, and other illicit actors to hide their identities and launder their money through the financial system.”

What does the corporate transparency act require?

The CTA requires “Reporting Companies” with less than $5M gross receipts or sales and 20 or fewer employees to report Beneficial Ownership Information (BOI) and company applicants to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

The Act defines a Reporting Company as any domestic or foreign corporation, LLC or similar entity registered to do business and filed with a secretary of state or other similar office and which does not fall within one of the 23 types of exempt entity types.

What is beneficial owner information (BOI)?

The CTA defines a beneficial owner as any entity or individual who, directly or indirectly, exercises substantial control over the entity or has 25% or more ownership interests in the Reporting Company. Determining what qualifies as “substantial control” depends on each case’s specific facts and circumstances.

In general, the key factor is whether the person has the authority to make significant decisions on behalf of the entity. For example, even without an ownership stake, senior executives or directors can be considered beneficial owners under the CTA. There are only five instances where a person normally considered a beneficial owner may be exempt.

Who is a company applicant?

A company applicant is any individual who (a) directly files the document that creates or registers the reporting company with a secretary of state or any similar office. Or (b) is primarily responsible for directing or controlling the filing of the document.

Domestic and foreign reporting companies created before January 1st 2024, are not required to provide the names of applicants who participated in creating the company.

Implications for family offices

Many family offices formed as a corporation or LLC may be required to report with FinCEN. However, some larger family offices may be exempt (see 23 types of exempt entity types).

Additionally, the family office must disclose information if it invests in a Reporting Company. That includes whether it exercises substantial control or has a 25% ownership interest.

How family offices can remain compliant

Family offices that qualify as a Reporting Company must disclose the following information regarding the entity: legal name, trade name, business address, jurisdiction information, and US Internal Revenue Service taxpayer identification number. In addition, they must submit beneficial owner information and company applicants (for companies registered after January 1st 2024).

Required disclosures regarding the beneficial owners and company applicants include legal name, date of birth, current address, and an image of an identification document with a unique identifying number (e.g., a passport). Any updates to information on the company or its beneficial owners must be updated within 30 days to FinCEN.

Failure to comply with the CTA may lead to civil penalties of up to $500 per day, with a maximum fine of $10,000. Or criminal penalties that could result in imprisonment for up to two years in a federal prison. Additionally, individual employees who are responsible for preparing and submitting reporting information may be held personally accountable for any false reports.

The Corporate Transparency Act has significant implications for family offices. It introduces a new era of accountability and transparency. Under the CTA, family offices must disclose sensitive information as a part of their reporting obligation. This includes disclosing legal names, addresses, and other personal details to FinCEN. Non-compliance can lead to hefty penalties and legal consequences. The act will place substantial pressure on the reporting operations of family offices in the future.

Family Office solutions

We support family offices with high-touch services and technology-led solutions. Discover how this support framework allows future focused family offices to set up and thrive.

Learn more
JurisdictionsOperations

What good governance looks like inside a single family office

In this article, Simple Expert Stephan Gerwert discusses what good governance looks like inside a single-family office, outlining practical steps to improve accountability, transparency, and long-term wealth protection.

Read

Data before AI: Why family offices need to fix the foundation first

Two-thirds of family offices want to integrate AI into their wealth reporting, yet only 29% have successfully done so, according to Campden Wealth and RBD. So, why such a huge gap? After sitting down with over 100 family offices this year, Ken Gamskjaer, CEO & Co-founder of Aleta, realised that implementing AI isn’t just another IT project waiting to happen. Instead, it’s a call to family office leadership to build a strong tech foundation. In this article, Ken discusses why tackling the "unglamorous" work of fixing your data foundation is the only real way to unlock the true potential of AI in family offices.

Read

Can all family office assets speak the same language?

Most family office asset managers don’t have a performance problem; they have a translation challenge. With data scattered across GP letters, private banking accounts, and public brokerage feeds, creating a unified view of a multi-asset portfolio is often an uphill battle. In an interview with MSCI’s Private Assets MD, Benjamin Page-Fort, we discuss what it means to have all assets, public and private, harmonised to speak a "common language."

Read