Family Office Venture Capital Review 2023

1. Introduction

The immediate uncertainty ignited by the collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) subsided as the FDIC stepped in to guarantee all deposits and took steps to secure funds for other mid-sized banks. Questions about oversight, capital requirements, and moral hazard came to the fore in the United State. Potential weaknesses in the banking sector spread to Europe, which saw UBS purchase its longtime rival Credit Suisse. For many of us who lived through the 2008 global financial crisis, this brought up vivid memories of that difficult period.

For startups and VC investors, the trouble at SVB highlighted the role of venture debt and the immediate banking needs of startups to meet payroll and pay vendors so they can continue to operate and grow. As examined in this review, VC is a high-risk asset class and these events draw that out in sharper relief. But if SVB’s collapse is indeed chilling start-up funding, then perhaps this is a time of opportunity for family offices in this space.

2. The Venture Capital Landscape

The talented entrepreneurs bringing their innovations to market are at the centre of the venture capital world. Startups need access to the capital, of course, and that’s the raison d’etre of VC investing, but most startups also need mentoring and support in areas such as business development that family offices are ideally positioned to provide either through their own internal capacity or through their networks.

Investors accept the risks inherent in venture capital investments because they seek returns greater or uncorrelated to listed equities or other asset classes. Many VC investors are also driven by their desire to fund innovative solutions to societal problems. The nature of investing in early funding rounds of a startup attempting to bring an innovative new solution to market requires understanding the technology and service landscape of the industry in addition to the business prospects of the new firm. The world is not static and an extended product development cycle brings technological and market changes, increasing uncertainty. It is often repeated that 90% of startups fail. This statistic serves as a caution by highlighting the significant risk of investments being complete losses in this asset class. However, VC investing is not just about avoiding risk but identifying opportunities that many seasoned VC investors miss.

Venture investment is a competitive landscape where major VC funds with deep connections and technical expertise dominate in terms of total capital raised and deal flows. Tiger Global and Sequoia Capital stand out in this regard as does the SoftBank Vision Fund.

Share On Linkedin

Download

The factors in favour of the large VC firms maintaining their position are their brand, track record, a strong pipeline of potential new deals, significant non-monetary resources such as connections and advising, and, lastly, interest from entrepreneurs themselves.

The funding cycle bookended by the 2008 economic crisis and the covid era was marked by the incredible amount of money poured into VC. These two era-defining events unevenly impacted the VC landscape. Recent challenging macroeconomic conditions have focused attention on the potential headwinds faced in the VC space, though differentiated across business and technology sectors.

In recent decades the focus of much VC funding has been on potentially disruptive innovations. However, there are focused critiques on the limitations of VC, especially of institutional VC investors, to “advance substantial technological change” across society because of the “narrow band” of potential technology they choose to invest in. Additionally, as noted above, identifying the most disruptive firms at an early stage that will succeed is a difficult task.

Of the large VC funds, Tiger Global made waves over the past few years for the amount of capital it invested around the world and the speed at which it did so. It reportedly outsourced due diligence and inked deals in a matter of days. It is debatable if Tiger Global Management truly ate the VC world, but the difference in approach from family office VC investing is striking. Most family offices choose to allocate their resources differently than these super-funds, which brings us a discussion about what family offices bring to the VC table, what function VC investments have in a family office portfolio, and what paths family offices take to achieve their desired exposure to the asset class.

3. Family Offices and Venture Capital

Venture capital is one of the most demanding asset classes for investors. Deal sourcing and due diligence require deep networks and experienced team members or trusted external capacity. The extended time horizon of illiquidity needs to be accounted for and managed. VC sits squarely on the high-risk/high-potential returns side of possible investments. VC is a highly specialised area where it takes time to develop expertise. Family offices, of course, function to both protect and grow wealth, which leads them to follow comprehensive wealth management strategies that may tolerate significant risk in part of their portfolio.

Simple’s six family office archetypes differ significantly in operating capacity and orientation, which influence how they chart their paths to VC investing. The demands of VC require an interest in the asset class and team members to source, do diligence, and manage the investments at a minimum. Providing continuing business support takes an even larger staff commitment. A startup family office may have deep connections to the VC space, while a legacy family office may be more comfortable delegating this part of their portfolio to a trusted investment fund. Across the archetypes, rationales for investing in the asset class, or avoiding it altogether, hinge on risk/reward calculations and the toleration of illiquidity. Average allocations flatten these different journeys, but they do evidence the significant interest of family offices in VC.

Share On Linkedin

Download

4. Paths to VC Exposure

Direct? Funds? Funds of funds? What model is best for family offices?
The answer to that question lies in the family office itself influenced by its interest, knowledge, capacity, available capital, and other factors. When Simple spoke with family office principals and fund managers, one often repeated observation was that opportunities and risk management come through your internal capacity and network. Family offices lacking in either might be best served, at least initially, by investing through VC funds, before making co-investments and eventually investing in a fund’s general partnership to gain experience, expand their network, and gain a presence in their targeted VC ecosystem. Drawing on years of experience in the highly competitive technology sector in Silicon Valley, California, one well-placed VC investor put it simply:

“Access is the key”

What they were stressing is just how strong the competition is among investors for the best investments, the startups that they believed had the greatest potential for success.

Further reading...

insights Venture Capital

Venture investing: which model is best for family offices?

Every year, thousands of startup founders set out in search of funding for their business ideas, offering the promise of substantial returns for...

5. Managing Liquidity and Valuation

There is no way to ignore the illiquidity of VC investments. The length of time is influenced by the seed stage of investments and the ultimate success of the startup. A late-stage investment made before a quick high-value buyout is a rare occurrence. One common strategy for managing liquidity in VC investments (and other assets with long time horizons like bonds) is to take a laddered approach. This may help add a measure of predictability to this part of a portfolio, but it does not factor in risk. Direct VC investors, especially ones that are not involved in the development of the startup, may only have solid accounting data for the amount they invested and the percentage of the company that they own. As the startup matures, its revenue can be tracked and factored into its valuation through standard accounting norms. As a startup goes through additional funding rounds, the value of the initial investment can be estimated by comparing it to the new investments, especially by large funds, in subsequent rounds. This is all to say that before earnings, early-stage investments are very incredibly difficult to value and what’s more, any value is difficult to realise because there is limited ability to sell an early-stage VC investment. The common theme that emerged when Simple spoke with active family office VC investors is that timely communication by startups varied as did their success rate. Accepting the risk and waiting brought both surprising successes and failures.

6. Venture Capital and Private Equity

The family offices we spoke with commonly viewed their venture capital and private equity investments as a continuum in their portfolio allocation of alternative assets. Considerations of the amount invested, timeframe, and potential returns skewed toward the long term reveal a spectrum and the considerations at each stage of a company’s growth. Nonetheless, VC and PE are distinct asset classes in their structure and financing. For example, PE investments are often leveraged, which increases their sensitivity to macroeconomic conditions and interest rates.

Share On Linkedin

Download

In aggregate VC returns have been greater than PE returns in recent years despite their higher risk, though the data below reflects a funding cycle that saw strong economic growth. Timing is crucial in VC investments.

Share On Linkedin

Download

7. Market Insights: Promising Sectors in Turbulent Times

Venture capital went through an incredible spending cycle between the 2008 economic crisis and the current period. One well-placed VC investor views the present period as one for reflection and to double down on the need for a clear understanding of the purpose of VC investments in a family office portfolio today.

“Think through what family office direct VC investments look like in an up cycle and a down cycle. Are you searching for yield? What about your need for liquidity over the long and near term? What are the ramifications for putting money in private tech now at this point in the cycle?”

8. Conclusion

Often the simplest advice is the best advice. Across our interviews with family offices and VC funds, we heard guidance about the risks and the extended period of illiquidity inherent in this asset class. The surprising success that came from the buyout of a company that the investor had nearly written off was matched with stories of failed investments. Even the best minds with patient capital get it wrong. Family offices looking to move into venture investing have options to move slowly and build networks, capacity, and experience as part of an extended learning process to maximise the potential for returns.

9. Acknowledgement

Simple would like to thank Kjartan Rist, co-founder of Concentric, for sharing his invaluable insight in assisting with this review.